Christianity, Immorality/Sin, Theology and Atheism

 

(Selected indignation, insight, witticism and commentary from me, an ex-Catholic atheist.)

 

Say It Loud and Clear!

 

The question professed Christians cannot answer: "Why do you Christians sin so much?" Isn't the God you believe in, once you embrace him (or is it her, or it?), supposed to infuse you with the Divine Grace to make you stop sinning?! I had a Catholic priest tell me, as a lame apologetic, "We're all sinners." To which we "immoral" atheists can reply, "We may have 'sinned' by masturbating, or having sexual intercourse outside of marriage, but none of us sinned by—

Catholic priest-pedophilia (or by Protestant pedophilia), nor by its deliberate cover-up by Catholic bishops and cardinals!"

 

Christian Liars

 

Of the Ten Commandments, both the Protestant Ninth Commandment, and the Catholic Eighth Commandment, forbid bearing false witness against one’s neighbor, i.e., lying.  Yet Christians, notably both Protestant and Catholic, lie all the time, especially when 1.) it’s to their advantage to do so; 2.) to get back at someone; or 3.) to curry favor with a third party; or of course, for any combination of the above.  They’ll even lie under oath, perjure themselves, if they think they can get away with it.  They’ll lie shamelessly, banking on God’s forgiveness.  What hypocrites!

 

So Many Moral Pieces of Shit…

 

…believe in God and the Savior Jesus, and look forward to Divine Forgiveness for their transgressions when they die, or even before, even as they freely commit moral atrocities against others, in direct contravention of Christ’s own admonition to “Love thy neighbor as thyself”!

 

Had a Chat with Satan Today

 

He affirmed that he likes me, and thinks I’m really worthwhile.  He also gave me a number of good things over the years:  metal music, “playing with myself,” recreational sex, just to name a few.  But Jesus Christ, meh.  While he says he loves me unconditionally, he also says I’m going to burn in hell forever for being an ex-Catholic atheist!  As for Jesus’ Christian followers, they were notable for consistently treating me like shit.  They are the analogues of the “good Jews” Jesus himself called “hypocrites,” “Pharisees,” "whited sepulchers."

 

Heretical

 

Did Satan create Catholic priest-pedophiles, deliberately covering-up Catholic bishops and Cardinals, indifferent-to-priest-pedophilia Popes, and in my case personally, booze-soaked unctuous hypocrite Catholic priests such as my high school principal?  No, theologically speaking!  According to Christian (not just Catholic, but including Catholic) theology, all these and even more nefarious evils were created by omniscient, omnipotent, infallible and benevolent God himself, not only out of his unconditional love for all humanity (even as he sends many humans to the torment of burning in hell forever!), but also, as part of his—Perfect Divine Plan.

 

The Gospel According to Johnny B. Goode

(No, Chuck Berry, I do not apologize!)

 

To paraphrase the Gospel of John—

 

“For God so loved the world he gave it Catholic priest-pedophiles and deliberately covering-up bishops, Cardinals, and even Popes; Prosperity Gospel hucksters such as Joel Osteen and Creflo Dollar; Antichrist Christians such as Donald ‘I’m proud to be a Christian’ Trump; Popes Francis-and- Leo XIV-bashing Catholics such as JD Vance, and much more.  Further, in his Yahweh incarnation, God gave us Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir, Smotrich, and those nasty West Bank Jewish settlers; in his Allah incarnation gave us Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iran, and Islamism; and in his Catholic incarnation, gave us the Inquisition, the persecution of Galileo, the ecclesiastical murder of Giordano Bruno for teaching modern science, and the burning alive of tens of thousands during the Middle Ages for alleged witchcraft, for homosexuality, and for heresy!”

 

On the Problem of Evil

 

I would remind you that it wasn't Satan who created Catholic priest-pedophiles and their covering-up bishops and cardinals, Prosperity Gospel hucksters such as Joel Osteen and Creflo Dollar, Christians such as "I'm proud to be a Christian" Donald Trump, or white Christian Nationalists—he turned all this creation over to God, who did it as part of his Divine Love manifested in his Perfect Plan!

 

Have to Hand It to the Catholic Church

 

It certainly knows how to provide expertise on moral and behavioral issues.  For example, its experts on sexuality, sexual and romantic love, and child rearing are all—ordained celibate old men who read about all such matters in Latin while in the seminary!

 

Response to a Christian Door-to-Door Missionary

 

In answer to the question, “Will you allow Jesus Christ to enter your life today as your personal Savior?”:

 

“No, thank you.  I’ve already allowed Satan to enter my life as my personal Savior.”

 

 

It’s Hard Being an “Immoral” Atheist!

 

It’s really hard being an “immoral” atheist!  And Christians should be more charitable, and realize that.  Consider this.  We spend our days in very busy, hectic, activity raping, robbing,  pillaging, and murdering.  Our days are so busy and hectic doing all this that we don’t even have time to take a decent lunch break.  All we can do is grab a baby to eat on the run.  Then, after our hard, hectic days, the only way we “immoral” atheists are able to relax in the evening is through wild sex-and-drug orgies, after which we finally get some sleep by passing out in a drug-and-alcohol-induced stupor.  That’s a hard life we “immoral” atheists have!

 

Aside from Being an Atheist, What Am I?

 

I’m a victim of overwhelmingly Christian maliciousness, cruelty, abuse, and insensitivity, primarily Catholic, but also Protestant, upscale alleged “freethinkers” who didn’t want to confront the religious abuse I suffered, and one nefarious Jewish person I thought was a good friend until he betrayed me, then had the chutzpah to insist I “forgive” him for his alleged “egregious stupidity”!  (In reality, though, his actions were all deliberate; the “egregious stupidity” on his part was getting caught and being held to account!)  I was bullied and socially ostracized in the Catholic grade and high schools I was forced to attend; my Catholic siblings (my four younger sisters who grew up with me, all pretty, pert, all of them sorority girls in college, and all of them—vapid) regarded me as an ugly, unpopular nerd they wanted nothing to do with.  My Catholic parents, when they weren’t screaming at me at the top of their lungs in 15-minute-long tirades, utterly ignored me; and as a young adult in Indianapolis, the “peaceable religious progressives,” with whom I agreed with on a good 90 percent of the political issues of the day, responded to me with maliciousness, bigotry, and dismissiveness.  All that, too, is what I am.

 

 

 

 

 

Deep Irony Alert! (lest the "woke" left get offended"): Slavery Was Fun!

 In "honor" of Trump and his minions' "whitewashing" (apt term) of American history, museum exhibits, and just plain grousing, as the MAGA loyalist complained about the Smithsonian "overemphasizing" slavery:

1.)   The newly enslaved got to leave their constricted African villages and travel, move, to new and exotic lands across the Atlantic Ocean.

 

2.)   The newly enslaved went there by way of a leisurely sea cruise on well apportioned ships.

 

3.)   The newly enslaved had the opportunity to learn new job skills.

 

4.)   The newly enslaved got exposure to Christianity, and thus became “saved,” instead of being damned to hell for their indigenous pagan religions.

 

5.)   The newly enslaved males had lots of opportunities to have sex with slave women (to reproduce more slaves, of course), and newly enslaved females often had sexual opportunities as well, especially with interracial sex.

 

and last,

 

6.)   The newly enslaved got to meet new people, usually people of a different race and ethnicity, thus diversifying their social circles.

 

So, who says slavery wasn’t fun?

 

 

A Most Inauspicious Sixtieth Anniversary

 

The year I graduated from high school, 1965, was also the year in which average SAT scores peaked.  From then on, they declined.  Not coincidentally, I believe, it was also when the “dumbing down” craze was inaugurated among educators and academics, in order to make a college education more “accessible” to minorities, women, and other groups considered disadvantaged.  By lowering the bar, it was argued, more deserving people could get in, could enter the hallowed Halls of Ivy, and move up socially and economically in US society—thereby ending decades of deliberate discrimination that kept especially generations of African Americans locked into poverty and low-paying, dead-end jobs.  This was also a time when automation was eliminating many low-skill factory jobs, thereby creating new technological unemployment.  Last, the seemingly triumphant final success of the Civil Rights Movement in breaking down the legal barriers of segregation and discrimination, along with the rise of the New Left, meant that there was fertile social ground, especially among the young white and well-educated, to at last seriously address the “race problem” in American life.  Militant demonstrations occurred on college campuses demanding Open Admissions for anyone who wanted to attend, a demanded echoed by black nationalist groups on campus from newly admitted African American students.  Academic standards were seen as barriers to social and racial justice, not as necessary linchpins and gates to ensure a quality education.

 

Looking back sixty years later, we see that what was also inaugurated was a horrible naïveté along with white masochistic guilt, particularly among newly radicalized students and academics.  This meant that, far from opening up academia, “dumbing down” only debased the quality of education colleges offered, and brought in large numbers of students not at all prepared for college academic expectations.  This, coupled with a supposedly “hard-headed” businesslike “transactional” approach to education, where education was valued not as an end in itself, but only as a means for being credentialed to get a good-paying job, made it join naïvely with this “transactional” approach, both of which in tandem played key roles in debasing the quality of education, made education as an end in itself seem “worthless,” and fueled a deeper anti-intellectualism and distrust of “educated elites” that debased the whole of American society, especially when Trump came into prominence, or ever since at least 2015.  A debasement that haunts us horribly today.  Further, while I don’t relish at all quoting or acknowledging conservative commentators, I admit that sometimes they get it right more than does the left—a case of even a blind squirrel finding an acorn sometimes!  (As a former co-worker of mine once put it.)  So, I do have to acknowledge far right commentator Joseph Starobin when he pointedly noted that US society had degenerated from teaching Latin and Greek in high school to teaching remedial English in college today.  The same point was made very recently (as I write, late July 2025) by Boston Globe’s conservative columnist Jeff Jacoby in his column “Arguable,” where he noted that a Massachusetts high school graduate in 1895 was expected to know more, and did, in fact, know more, than a Massachusetts high school graduate today.  He pointedly notes that back then an education was considered both a right (hence, public schools) and a valuable end in itself, against both the onslaughts of the business-transactional right and the anti-discriminatory left against such a supposed mere “nostrum.”

 

And yet—educational equality seems further away today than it did sixty years ago, with many critics, and even rival racial and ethnic minorities, claiming that “affirmative action” and “DEI” only brought a bunch of unqualified African Americans onto college campuses, to the detriment of both more “meritorious” racial and ethnic groups (notably Asians), and even merit itself.  This has even fueled overt racism, such as Trump supporter Charlie Kirk’s comment that if he were on an airplane, the only way he could ensure the pilot was competent was if he was a (presumably straight) white male!  Thus, were “he” gay, transgender, female, African American, Latino, other dark-skinned racial minority, “he” might be “unqualified” to pilot an aircraft, owing “his” piloting to “his” being a DEI hire instead!  

 

Thus has “dumbing down” backfired.  Rather than creating a more racially inclusive society, it’s created a more racially divided society, as even the whole concept of African American “merit” is under question.

 

As my old academic advisor Scott Gordon, late Distinguished Professor of Economics Emeritus at Indiana University-Bloomington, pointed out in his 1980 book, Welfare, Justice, and Freedom, there’s an unavoidable contradiction between equality of opportunity and equality as such, or as we and many African American militants put it, equal results.  For equality of opportunity means there are winners and losers, winners and also-rans, some who make it to the top and some who don’t.  It’s like the Super Bowl:  no matter how evenly matched the two teams are, at the end of the game there is only one winner, and the other team is the loser.  While equality of opportunity is a prerequisite for equal results, equality of opportunity does not mean equal results, certainly not in the short one—and no amount of “revolutionary impatience” can change that.  Certainly I, who wishes to eventually see equal results, must concede, in terms of reality, they are still quite a ways away, and that the ability of African Americans to attend college does not ensure their success when they do.  Social, cultural, educational, economic, and other obstacles are still in the way.  (Which does not in any way justify Trump’s open attack on the very notion of even trying to achieve racial equality or even rough parity.)  Further, we are living in a society today that has grown tired of even trying to achieve racial justice, to address even minimally the vast injustices done to black Americans all the way back into slavery.  While I do not know what the solution is, I do know that the naïve left’s “dumbing down” agenda it’s eagerly promoted sixty years ago and since only created another problem, not any kind of solution whatsoever.