According to the Indianapolis Star, the leading
newspaper for the State of Indiana, 46.6% of Indiana’s recent college graduates
leave the state annually, while the largest influx of in-migration to Indiana
consists of those with less than a 10th grade education. Already, in a state with an economy that is
still nearly 17% dominated by manufacturing, where layoffs are a major
occurrence, only a third of Indiana’s workers have a high school diploma of the
equivalent, and only 28% of Indiana’s workers in the prime age work group of
25-34 have college degrees. This
compares to 39% nationally. Yet by 2025
60% of Indiana’s workforce will have to hold college degrees for the Indiana
economy to stay productive. (Again from the Indianapolis Star.)
But right
now a college graduate in Indiana is more likely to be told that she or he is
“overqualified and underexperienced” and not hired, rather than hired.
I know that
personally—for I am one of those “overqualified and underexperienced” college
grads, are many of my friends and associates.
And like many of them, I work at CTB/McGraw-Hill in Indianapolis through
the temp agencies Kelly Services or Dployit working the regular but strictly
seasonal job of scoring the state school system standardized tests that have
become de rigueur for the schools since the passage of the No Child Left
Behind Act. During the peak of the
season, over 1,000 college grads are so employed—at a job which, while it requires
a college degree, only pays as much as a security guard, with no benefits, and
is essentially a niche job with few transferable skills. (What we do is most akin to what is only part
of a teacher’s job—grading tests and papers.)
Yet, for many of us, this is the most substantial employment we have all
year round.
Jim Weddle,
then General Manager for Kelly Services at CTB/McGraw-Hill, keenly aware of this
pool of intellectual talent he had out there, has tried to shop around the list
of Kelly employees scoring tests to other employers—to no avail. Just not interested.
The
recession has made things even worse, of course. For example, during the 2009 test-scoring
season at CTB/McGraw-Hill, from mid-March to mid-June, I saw returning to work
many colleagues I hadn’t seen out there for the couple of years. Their reason for coming back was all the
same: laid off from the jobs they’d held previously, often with little prospect
of being called back.
One such
person in this situation is Jerry Hall, a lawyer eligible in Indiana to
practice law, but unable to financially afford to do so. For the last two years he’d had a steady but
low-paying warehouse job that enabled him to get by, but he was laid off from
that. He was grateful that there was at
least the test scoring to come back to, but had no idea of what he’d do for
work when the season ended. “I hope I
can find a warehouse job that will pay me $8.00 an hour,” he said. Right now he’s diligently looking for
warehouse and other unskilled and semi-skilled work to tide him through—but
Indiana had 10.7% unemployment in June 2009, considerably higher than the
national average of 9.5%, so he was not optimistic. More pointedly, even if he did have a client
who would pay him for legal representation, he couldn’t afford to spend the
time it takes to be an effective attorney, for his days have to be spent
looking for work, and the regular 2010 test-scoring season won’t resume until
mid-March, with little hope for windfall projects being available before then.
Ironically,
Indiana employers have been importing college graduates from elsewhere to fill
the few high-tech jobs available, while Indiana’s college graduates go
underemployed and unemployed for “not having the right degree.” Which defeats the very purpose of the stated
official goal of educationally upgrading Indiana’s work force. Because, for one thing, a college education
goes far beyond vocational training, no matter how specialized and technical
the profession one’s trained for; a real college education enhances one’s
ability to think, to assess critically, to research, to expand one’s
intellectual outlook, and to appreciate the arts and culture. So, while Indianapolis, typical of other
Hoosier cities in this regard, has a plethora of shopping malls and upscale
restaurants, its dearth of artistic and cultural amenities is not something the
truly educated person is going to find attractive. He or she simply wants more than just
shopping malls.
Perhaps no
where is this better seen than is the latest boosterist fad being promoted to
solve Indiana’s economic dilemma: replacing declining manufacturing jobs with
new, highly-skilled jobs in biotech. But
Guidant, a biotech pioneer formerly in Indianapolis, left the state when it was
bought by pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson, and the state has not
been able to attract significant biotech investment and venture capital since
that departure. Yet, what’s increasingly
become a will o’ the wisp for the quintessentially Rust Belt Indiana economy is
still touted widely by Indiana’s politicians and business leaders. This despite that biotech is fast becoming
just another economic development illusion that joins those other economic
development illusions promoted in the past—such as Indianapolis becoming the
amateur sports capital of the nation, or a major convention and tourism
site.
Recently,
the Indianapolis Star touted the job-creating possibilities of biotech
by pointing to the alleged job opportunities created by pharmaceutical company
Eli Lilly & Co., and prosthetics manufacturer Cook Instruments, both of
which had been in Indiana for quite some time—they had provided 7,200
jobs. This in a state that, according to
the Bureau of Labor Statistics, had lost 156,000 jobs from May 2008 to May
2009! Showing that Indiana’s weak
economy hurts its workforce across the board, more than just the
college-educated.
No comments:
Post a Comment